I’ve never understood why a stiff arm to the… AsideOctober 10, 2011 Nick Momrik5 Comments I’ve never understood why a stiff arm to the face isn’t a penalty. Share thisTweet Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Like Loading... Related
I agree. It makes for some exciting and spectacular plays. But if the reason for the rule is to prevent injury it seems like it should go both ways. LikeLike Reply
I think any “hands to the face” is a penalty technically, but rarely called. Plus it’s an exciting play like this: Found this article in the NYT from 2008 that talks about it: http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/04/in-defense-of-the-stiff-arm/ LikeLike Reply
As long as the ball carrier doesn’t grab hold, I think it’s legal. It’s a penalty if you don’t have the ball though. LikeLike Reply
Because it’s one of the greatest things in football. 🙂
LikeLike
Agreed. Plus, then we couldn’t see this:
LikeLike
I agree. It makes for some exciting and spectacular plays. But if the reason for the rule is to prevent injury it seems like it should go both ways.
LikeLike
I think any “hands to the face” is a penalty technically, but rarely called. Plus it’s an exciting play like this:
Found this article in the NYT from 2008 that talks about it: http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/04/in-defense-of-the-stiff-arm/
LikeLike
As long as the ball carrier doesn’t grab hold, I think it’s legal. It’s a penalty if you don’t have the ball though.
LikeLike